« be an expert! | Main | internet porn kills lust? »
April 08, 2004
Beyond the Pretty (Inter)Face
A lot of people have been sending me the link to the Visual Thesaurus lately, and it's picking up a lot of links in del.icio.us, as well. It's visually quite striking.
The first person who sent this to me, however, was my mother. And she suggested that I start by looking up the word "woman." So I did. You should, too. (I'll wait.)
Here are the meanings that the thesaurus assigns to this noun:
- An adult female person (as opposed to a man)
- Women as a class
- A human female who does housework
- (informal) A female person who plays a significant role (wife or mistress or girlfriend) in the life of a particular man.
The largest, most visually significant cluster of words shown in the visual representation focuses around "cleaning woman," and includes "charwoman," "char," and "cleaning lady" as additional terms.
I would expect something like this from an archaic dictionary...but not from a reference tool for the 21st century. This is not the definition of "woman" that I want my 7 and 9-year-old sons using as their basis for understanding gender.
Let's be careful about blindly accepting new tools--from thesauri to search engines--without thinking about the information within them, and their ability to shape perceptions.
Posted by Liz Lawley at 01:33 PM in Software | Permalink
Comments
By the way, the entry for man does much the same thing - the largest, most visually significant cluster of words focuses around valet.
Posted by: Ian Griffiths at Apr 8, 2004 2:59:25 PM
Hrm. When I tried it for "man" I got "adult male" as largest, a cluster for military type associations and one cluster for "humans, human race, mankind, humanity", etc. None of which showed up in the search for "woman". Good point Liz!
Posted by: Fazia Rizvi at Apr 8, 2004 3:32:08 PM
This came up on a poetry list a few weeks ago, folks talking about how much fun it is. And I thought so, too, until I tried "woman" -- brought this back to the list, where there was a very brief exchange, and we all dropped it.
I moved the link from my front page to my back, because, as a poet, I do like the movement of it.
Perhaps I will reconsider.
Sometimes I get very tired of giving things up on this account; there are so many of them.
Posted by: SB at Apr 9, 2004 1:26:43 AM
Hmm, one of their 'transvestite' definitions is a bit dodgy too.
Posted by: Loz at Apr 10, 2004 4:15:21 PM
Try the word "love." This tool although interesting is really just a gimmick. The content is obviously lacking when love is defined in terms appropriate for maybe a tabloid newspaper editor.
Posted by: Al Kee at Apr 18, 2004 5:38:43 AM
very informal......
Posted by: Werner Mo at Aug 23, 2004 7:50:08 AM
really great site...
Posted by: Henni Marie at Sep 17, 2004 4:49:43 AM
How can you tell if your husband is on chat lines and porn on the internet? I know you can check the h
history, but is there any other way?
Posted by: Betty Mullens at Aug 4, 2005 12:05:02 PM